The Hastings Banner's top local news story in 2021 was Sheriff Dar Leaf’s investigation into alleged voter fraud – and the private investigator he brought to Barry County to question the township clerks.
Leaf first told The Banner in July that his office had opened a voter fraud investigation into the 2020 election. He said he couldn't share any more information because the probe was continuing.
The investigation was prompted by a complaint that the sheriff’s office had received regarding Barry County.
Several township clerks, and Barry County Clerk Pam Palmer, said they were questioned in the investigation, and they expressed concern that the person who appeared to be leading it was not a Barry County Sheriff’s deputy, but a private investigator named Michael Lynch.
The clerks said a deputy drove Lynch to their offices, then let Lynch ask the questions while the deputy recorded the interview. Lynch, who gave them no information about himself outside of his name, seemed particularly interested in the Dominion voting machines that were used in the election, and Palmer’s role in using them.
“It seemed like they were targeting the county,” Thornapple Township Clerk Cindy Wilshire said.
Lynch asked them if Palmer could have been in a room with the equipment by herself, and what role Palmer had in programming the equipment.
Rutland Township Clerk Robin Hawthorne said she talked about Palmer's role in the election, and explained to Lynch the limits on Palmer's ability to alter the results, but Lynch kept returning to that subject.
“It was Pam this and Pam that,” Hawthorne said.
Hawthorne said Lynch questioned whether the cards used to program the machines could have altered the votes.
“He was concerned about thinking the cards had some kind of programming in them, that when Trump got so many votes they flipped the votes to Biden,” Hawthorne said, “which is ludicrous because Trump won Barry County by 65 percent.”
The clerks verify the machines and the machines' accuracy in a test before the election when members of the public are allowed to be present.
“Our accuracy test was dead-on both times; the machines worked fine,” Hawthorne said. “I've been a clerk for 18 years and it was the same election as the whole time I've been here.”
Hawthorne said she is certain no one tampered with the vote in her township.
“There's no way anybody can hack my machines,” she said.
The election equipment can't be connected to an outside computer, Hawthorne said. Even if someone had been able to tamper with the machines, it would
leave evidence of that fact.
“There's a paper trail locked down like you wouldn't believe,” Hawthorne said.
Lynch never asked to look at the voting equipment or any documents, the clerks said.
It also was apparent to some of the clerks that Lynch wasn't an expert in the field, based on the questions he asked them.
“I don't think he has a clue on how the machines work,” Hawthorne said.
“It didn't seem like they had an idea of how an election is run,” Wilshire said.
Hawthorne said she wanted to know how Lynch came to Barry County, who is paying him and what he's basing his investigation on. “Who sent these guys out on their witch hunt?” Hawthorne asked.
None of the clerks who spoke to The Banner said they saw any evidence of fraud in their townships during the election.
“I can't believe there was any in our county, but there was none in our township,” Wilshire said.
Barry County Prosecutor Julie Nakfoor Pratt also expressed concern about Lynch.
“I was concerned because I heard there was somebody doing the investigation alongside [the deputy] who is not a police officer,” Pratt said. “Apparently, he
holds himself up as some kind of forensic auditor – and those are very expensive. So, I don't know what he was auditing, or if he was in his capacity as an auditor. But, if he was, the question that popped into my mind was, 'Well, who's paying him?' Is he doing this for free?'
“My understanding is that he was doing a tremendous amount of questioning. So, I'd like to know, if this is a law enforcement investigation, who is he?”
At one point, Pratt called for a halt to the investigation, until Leaf explained to her what his office was doing.
The sheriff was initially unclear about Lynch in his conversations with The Banner.
“I don't know too much about him,” Leaf said, adding that he did not know who was paying Lynch or if he has an official title or special training.
Lynch is not an attorney, Leaf added, but he is helping the department with election issues because the sheriff's officers are not trained in how to investigate election fraud.
“This is pretty new stuff for us,” the sheriff said, pointing out that his office frequently goes to outside parties for help.
He later identified Lynch as a former chief security officer for DTE in Detroit.
Leaf said Lynch is experienced and qualified to help with this investigation and that the county isn’t paying him.
“He's privately funded somewhere,” Leaf said. “I don't know. I don't know if he's a private investigator or what.”
The sheriff added that he did not have any problem not knowing who was paying Lynch to work with his office.
The Banner's efforts to reach Lynch were unsuccessful.
However, a DTE spokesman said Lynch had retired in 2019 and doesn't work there anymore.
Bridge Michigan was able to contact Lynch, and he spoke to a reporter briefly before he directed the news outlet to his attorney, Stefanie Lambert Junttila.
She told Bridge that Lynch had done some work for her previously, but that he was not being paid to investigate voter fraud in Barry County.
Junttila had previously worked with Leaf on a lawsuit that tried to halt the state from certifying the vote. The suit used sworn affidavits from Barry County residents who stated their suspicions regarding election procedures, and also listed Dar Leaf “in his capacity as Barry County Sheriff.”
That lawsuit was dismissed by a judge.
Junttila was later sanctioned for filing another lawsuit alleging voter fraud, which U.S. District Court Judge Linda Parker called a “historic and profound abuse of the judicial process.”
Although Leaf had told The Banner that details of the investigation, including the complaint that started it, would not be divulged until the probe was complete, he eventually announced some of those details at a political rally in Hillsdale just a few weeks later.
He disclosed during the rally that the complaint came from a former employee of the sheriff’s office, who The Banner then contacted.
Julie Jones, a former sergeant with the Barry County Sheriff's Office, confirmed that she had submitted the original complaint that started the investigation into voter fraud in Barry County.
Jones, who retired in 2019, said her complaint was based on a court document that came from a lawsuit filed by William Bailey in Antrim County. She had obtained it from the website of Bailey's lawyer, Matthew DePerno of Portage.
“It all came from the information, Barry County-specific information, from Matt DePerno's case brief,” Jones said. “My report pretty much mimicked what was in the case brief.”
She filed her complaint in April, but the lawsuit that it had been based on was dismissed by a judge in early May.
A report released by the Republican-led Senate Oversight Committee specifically named DePerno as pushing false election claims, a Bridge Michigan article reported.
“The committee closely followed Mr. DePerno’s efforts and can confidently conclude they are demonstrably false and based on misleading information and illogical conclusions,” the report said.
That report also called for the attorney general and Michigan State Police to investigate individuals who have made false claims about the election for profit or publicity.
DePerno raised more than $384,000 for an “election fraud defense fund,” and announced a campaign for attorney general, according to the Bridge story.
DePerno has since become a candidate for attorney general, and has been endorsed by Trump.
Jones said what she read in the Antrim County brief has led her to believe votes were stolen from Barry County residents, and that both Democrats and
Republicans conspired to steal the election from the former president.
“Am I in love with Donald Trump? No. Am I in love with freedom? Yes,” she said. “I'm pretty sure that there was fraud; actually, I would bet my life on it.
“Attorneys don't go to court lying. They go to court with information they can back up, because they can lose their license over that.”
Leaf also told the crowd at the Hillsdale rally that Barry County clerks had expressed concerns to him about the election.
“The big thing that my clerks are telling me – there's a handful of clerks anyways – they're complaining that they don't run the elections,” he said. “It's run by the vendor that goes and programs its computers. They say it's very vulnerable.”
“That's an outright lie,” Palmer said in response to these comments. “They (the clerks) do run the election; they're the ones that are there.”
None of the election officials The Banner interviewed said they had seen any evidence of fraud in Barry County.
“I know that there is no voter fraud in Barry County; I'm positive,” a member of the board of canvassers, Anne Richards, said. “It's just not possible. We feel very confident, the four of us (on the canvassing board), that the elections were very honest. ...
“We go through everything with a fine-tooth comb at the board of canvassers.”
Bob Price, a four-term member of the Barry County Board of Canvassers, which certifies the vote every election, said he doesn't see how the fraud they're
alleging would even be possible without leaving a trail of evidence.
“I don't buy it,” Price said.
As of Monday, the investigation was still ongoing, Leaf said, noting that he will not be able to report on its findings until it is finished.