Tracy Downs has four kids who have attended Hastings High School. And all four kids, she said, will not use the school bathrooms.
“They're just old, they're disgusting, they're falling apart,” she said.
Only in the case of an emergency will one of her kids use the bathroom.
“They will hold it as long as they can,” she added.
This isn’t a new issue for Downs, who lives in the city of Hastings. Her oldest child, who is now 28, graduated from the high school in 2010 and refused to use the bathroom then. Eleven years later, her youngest kid still refuses to use the bathrooms.
It’s one of the many reasons Downs will vote “yes” on the school bond proposal on the Aug. 3 ballot: The school needs serious upgrades to its facility and maintenance.
But it's also the reason others will vote “no”: Decades have passed, bonds have failed, bonds have passed and people still feel like not much has changed.
It has made for one of the most dividing issues in the Hastings community – something George Hubka, a former schoolteacher, saw firsthand from decades owning property in Hastings.
“Those in favor of it feel they have to have it and those who can't afford it or say they can't afford it, feel they can't afford it,” he said. “So you got the two polarizations completely opposite. And, in the middle, they have to participate in other activities like going to church, going to the ballgame to watch their kids participate or something and sit beside these people.”
The 2021 bond is proposed at 6.8 mills – a decrease from the current debt millage rate of 6.9 mills – and it would stay that way for five years if it's approved.
If the bond doesn’t pass, the school’s millage rate would drop to 6.0 mills.
The bond, which would generate $21.9 million in revenue, would go toward a variety of upgrades throughout the Hastings Area School System. The money can only be used to fund the items they list. That would include replacing windows, doors, desks, buses from 1997, and more. It would mean upgrading playground equipment, refurbishing bathrooms, revamping high school locker rooms that date back to 1970, improving the keying system, putting in an air purification system and installing LED lighting. The largest chunk of the funds would primarily go toward fixing the two-decades-old roof at the high school, costing about $1.8 to $2 million.
“I'd say the most important thing with this bond proposal is overall energy efficiencies and maintenance of our buildings,” Superintendent Matt Goebel said. “If you can imagine the square footage of this high school and replacing it with a brand new 21st century roof pairing that with double pane windows – not single pane windows, which lose energy – not only is it going to increase the efficiency savings within the district, but it's also going to increase our Consumers Energy rebates well over $300,000.”
Even with the incoming COVID-relief funds and increased state aid, Goebel said they do not have enough funds to cover all the district's needs – not without a bond.
“This bond you saw, it's not flashy,” citizens’ committee co-chairwoman Becky Deal said in an early June interview with The Banner. “We're not getting a new swimming pool or a new football field or anything flashy, or even gyms or anything. We're talking the roof. We're talking windows, busing. I mean, we're talking cement. We're talking windows, refurbishing bathrooms.”
With the school district’s 2015 bond set to expire this upcoming year, Goebel said he feels like it is the right time for another bond attempt.
“We were able to have a perfect opportunity to give our taxpayers the ability to continue to decrease that tax rate, but make a tremendous impact for our strategic plan as a district –– and that's the upkeep of our facilities,” Goebel said.
But some community members said they feel as though the school district has come to taxpayers with the same request in the past – and they haven’t made much progress.
“They’re asking for remodeling and windows and doors and stuff,” Jerry Greenfield, of Hastings Township, said. “Well, they got the money, so why are they asking them again? And again? And again?”
Greenfield has served as one of the leading voices against the bond. As he talked to The Banner from his garage, he laid documents from past bond requests and school data on the hood of a car. Signs that read “No more school tax” and “Vote no on new school tax” are leaning against a wall.
“I’m not against education,” Greenfield clarified, saying that he hands out scholarships for non-traditional vocational training, like plumbing, and nursing. He graduated in the first class from the new Hastings High School building in 1971 and his daughter also attended school in the district.
In past years, Greenfield said he has voted yes for the bond. But that changed within the last decade. He grew upset with the school when it cut vocational programs, such as machinery, woodworking, building and trades. From there, he started digging into the finances, collecting a folder's worth of Freedom of Information Act requests and questioning how the school used the money.
“They think that I'm a jacka--. Well, I am,” he said. “All I'm asking is, if I give you $30 or $40 million, I'm going to have $30 or $40 million worth of something out of it.”
Greenfield said he doesn’t care about the tax rate (“you got to pay taxes”). But, for others, like Dowling resident Linda Mellen, taxes are their main concern.
When Mellen hears of another bond, she said, “My hair goes up.”
“I think it is a slap in the face to the citizens of this township to ask them for more money. I just do,” she added. “I mean, there might be some people out there that can afford to keep paying it, but you know what –– there are a lot of us out here that are on fixed incomes.”
With the current state of affairs in the country, Mellen said she would benefit from not paying for a school bond.
“It's time people had a break once in a while because, No. 1, the prices of everything are going up, the cost of everything is going up, the income doesn't go up, but yet, we want to keep paying the same thing over and over,” she said.
For some of the “no” voters, they said they feel unheard. This is especially true in the townships, where, with the exception of Rutland Charter Township, past election results show that citizens vote overwhelmingly against the bond. In the city of Hastings, on the other hand, citizens vote overwhelmingly for the bond.
“I think the people on the outer areas are looked down upon and I'm going to tell you what –– there's a lot of people out in this area and they finally have started waking up and paying attention,” Mellen said.
After a June 8 meeting, citizens' committee co-chairmembers Becky Deal, Sam Randall and Jenny Haywood emphasized that, by investing in schools, citizens would see their own property value increase.
“Strong schools are strong for real estate and communities,” Haywood said.
Goebel added they have made a conscious effort to keep the tax rate low, pointing to the decrease from 6.9 mills to 6.8 mills with this 2021 bond request. He emphasized that other school districts, such as Pennfield School and Thornapple Kellogg Schools, have a tax rate that sit above 10 mills.
“I think this community is very comfortable with a tax rate that is lower than 7,” he said. “... I also think that it’s important to be fiscally responsible and I think you've got to balance that out.”
Sam Waller, a 2019 graduate of Hastings High School who will vote “yes,” said he has noticed the contrast between Hastings and other schools when he has traveled out of town for events.
“Every time you walked into their school, into their facilities, and it wasn't like you're in 1971, it's like you're in the 21st century,” Waller said. “I'm not trying to bash our school system –– it's great and our schools have had a lot of renovation done in the last few years. It's just this little bit of upkeep that we definitely need.”
Goebel said the school district has made some conscious changes from past bond proposals –– specifically keeping athletics out.
“One thing that we heard from the public is that they didn't necessarily want athletics involved in the bond proposal,” he said. “So that was one thing that, when we were planning for this particular bond proposal, we said we're going to keep athletics out of it.”
They also made the decision to run an informational campaign, he said, where they prioritized spreading details about the bond and the election, rather than pushing an explicit “yes” vote.
“This is a part of our strategic plan,” he said. “I've been very transparent with that.”
Goebel said he has not heard of much opposition against the bond from community members, adding, “I don’t feel the tension.”
“I feel very positive about this bond proposal,” he went on to say, “because I think the taxpayers really do understand that these are not just nickel-and-dime items. These are really going to help us move forward in a very smart way, when it comes to maintaining a better environment for our kids, but also better energy efficiencies, and being financially responsible toward our taxpayers.”
Community members on both sides of the ballot, however, do feel some uncertainty about the vote, especially given the election cycle. The vote is taking place on Aug. 3 and will be the only item on the ballot.
Already, there has been an increase in voters. As of Tuesday morning, the city of Hastings had collected 676 absentee ballots, city clerk Jane Saurman said. During the 2017 special election, the city received 467 voters altogether.
Greenfield said if the proposal took place during a presidential or gubernatorial election, he would expect it to “get murdered.” But this year, he thinks the vote will be close.
On the “yes” side of the vote, Tracy Downs plans to reach out to people in the community and inform them about the election. For now, she doesn’t want to take anything for granted.
“There are years where we have thought, ‘Yep, this is going to pass,’ ” she said. “I’ve sat on this bond board before and had a great feeling that it was going to pass and then, all of a sudden, it doesn’t.
“It just really depends on voter turnout, and who shows up.”